You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic map of evidence on the contribution of forests to poverty alleviation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-019-0148-4 |
| Authors |
Samantha H. Cheng, Kavita MacLeod, Sofia Ahlroth, Stefanie Onder, Emilie Perge, Priya Shyamsundar, Pushpendra Rana, Ruth Garside, Patti Kristjanson, Madeleine C. McKinnon, Daniel C. Miller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 15% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Nepal | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 65% |
| Scientists | 20 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 71 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 40 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 82 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,084,129
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#31
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,410
of 451,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.