You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: a non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-74 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Stochl, Peter B Jones, Tim J Croudace |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 25% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,430,211
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#969
of 2,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,609
of 167,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.