↓ Skip to main content

Correlating changes in lung function with patient outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pooled analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlating changes in lung function with patient outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pooled analysis
Published in
Respiratory Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-12-161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul W Jones, James F Donohue, Jerry Nedelman, Steve Pascoe, Gregory Pinault, Cheryl Lassen

Abstract

Relationships between improvements in lung function and other clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not documented extensively. We examined whether changes in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) are correlated with changes in patient-reported outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 25%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2012.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,055
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,871
of 285,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.