You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug-herb interactions in rats between warfarin and pomegranate peel or guava leaves extracts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12906-019-2436-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maisa Alnaqeeb, Kenza A. Mansor, Eyad M. Mallah, Bayan Y. Ghanim, Nasir Idkaidek, Nidal A. Qinna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,030,998
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,853
of 3,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,920
of 437,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#43
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.