↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of assessing energy and nutrient intake with the Vienna food record: a cross-over randomised study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability and validity of assessing energy and nutrient intake with the Vienna food record: a cross-over randomised study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12937-019-0431-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Putz, Birgit Kogler, Isabel Bersenkowitsch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 22 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 23 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,583,598
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#934
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,924
of 437,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.