You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Study protocol: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge trial of tailored support for implementing social determinants of health documentation/action in community health centers, with realist evaluation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0855-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachel Gold, Arwen Bunce, Erika Cottrell, Miguel Marino, Mary Middendorf, Stuart Cowburn, Dagan Wright, Ned Mossman, Katie Dambrun, Byron J. Powell, Inga Gruß, Laura Gottlieb, Marla Dearing, Jason Scott, Nadia Yosuf, Molly Krancari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 36% |
Ireland | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 44% |
Members of the public | 8 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
Professor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 26 | 19% |
Unknown | 50 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Unknown | 51 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,645,933
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#596
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,154
of 437,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.