↓ Skip to main content

Combined inactivation of the Clostridium cellulolyticum lactate and malate dehydrogenase genes substantially increases ethanol yield from cellulose and switchgrass fermentations

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined inactivation of the Clostridium cellulolyticum lactate and malate dehydrogenase genes substantially increases ethanol yield from cellulose and switchgrass fermentations
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-5-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongchao Li, Timothy J Tschaplinski, Nancy L Engle, Choo Y Hamilton, Miguel Rodriguez, James C Liao, Christopher W Schadt, Adam M Guss, Yunfeng Yang, David E Graham

Abstract

The model bacterium Clostridium cellulolyticum efficiently degrades crystalline cellulose and hemicellulose, using cellulosomes to degrade lignocellulosic biomass. Although it imports and ferments both pentose and hexose sugars to produce a mixture of ethanol, acetate, lactate, H2 and CO2, the proportion of ethanol is low, which impedes its use in consolidated bioprocessing for biofuels production. Therefore genetic engineering will likely be required to improve the ethanol yield. Plasmid transformation, random mutagenesis and heterologous expression systems have previously been developed for C. cellulolyticum, but targeted mutagenesis has not been reported for this organism, hindering genetic engineering.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 144 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 25%
Researcher 37 24%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 18%
Engineering 10 7%
Chemical Engineering 6 4%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#318
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,422
of 250,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.