↓ Skip to main content

Randomised controlled trial of improvisational music therapy's effectiveness for children with autism spectrum disorders (TIME-A): study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomised controlled trial of improvisational music therapy's effectiveness for children with autism spectrum disorders (TIME-A): study protocol
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monika Geretsegger, Ulla Holck, Christian Gold

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that music therapy may facilitate skills in areas typically affected by autism spectrum disorders such as social interaction and communication. However, generalisability of previous findings has been restricted, as studies were limited in either methodological accuracy or the clinical relevance of their approach. The aim of this study is to determine effects of improvisational music therapy on social communication skills of children with autism spectrum disorders. An additional aim of the study is to examine if variation in dose of treatment (i.e., number of music therapy sessions per week) affects outcome of therapy, and to determine cost-effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 312 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 17%
Student > Master 51 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Researcher 30 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 84 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 14%
Arts and Humanities 27 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 8%
Social Sciences 25 8%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 92 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,143,624
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#106
of 3,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,882
of 255,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.