↓ Skip to main content

Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 1,100)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-8-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bengt Kayser, Alexandre Mauron, Andy Miah

Abstract

Current anti-doping in competitive sports is advocated for reasons of fair-play and concern for the athlete's health. With the inception of the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA), anti-doping effort has been considerably intensified. Resources invested in anti-doping are rising steeply and increasingly involve public funding. Most of the effort concerns elite athletes with much less impact on amateur sports and the general public.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 231 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 23%
Student > Master 44 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Researcher 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 48 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 64 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 13%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Philosophy 7 3%
Other 50 21%
Unknown 53 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#611,863
of 25,386,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#33
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#962
of 91,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them