↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review searches must be systematic, comprehensive, and transparent: a critique of Perman et al

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
83 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review searches must be systematic, comprehensive, and transparent: a critique of Perman et al
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-6275-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Devon Greyson, Ellen Rafferty, Linda Slater, Noni MacDonald, Julie A. Bettinger, Ève Dubé, Shannon E. MacDonald

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 27 17%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 48 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 21%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 6%
Engineering 9 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 48 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#800,866
of 25,972,223 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#838
of 17,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,671
of 450,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#21
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,972,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.