↓ Skip to main content

The role and molecular mechanism of D-aspartic acid in the release and synthesis of LH and testosterone in humans and rats

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,142)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
27 X users
facebook
26 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
7 Google+ users
video
20 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role and molecular mechanism of D-aspartic acid in the release and synthesis of LH and testosterone in humans and rats
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-7-120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enza Topo, Andrea Soricelli, Antimo D'Aniello, Salvatore Ronsini, Gemma D'Aniello

Abstract

D-aspartic acid is an amino acid present in neuroendocrine tissues of invertebrates and vertebrates, including rats and humans. Here we investigated the effect of this amino acid on the release of LH and testosterone in the serum of humans and rats. Furthermore, we investigated the role of D-aspartate in the synthesis of LH and testosterone in the pituitary and testes of rats, and the molecular mechanisms by which this amino acid triggers its action.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Researcher 16 13%
Other 15 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 17%
Sports and Recreations 19 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Chemistry 7 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 414. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#71,416
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#8
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108
of 108,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.