You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
ENVirT: inference of ecological characteristics of viruses from metagenomic data
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2019
Duleepa Jayasundara, Damayanthi Herath, Damith Senanayake, Isaam Saeed, Cheng-Yu Yang, Yuan Sun, Bill C. Chang, Sen-Lin Tang, Saman K. Halgamuge
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||60%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||21%|
|Student > Bachelor||5||15%|
|Student > Master||3||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||6||18%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||6||18%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
of 7,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 439,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.