You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-11 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carla Guerriero, Maureen GC Gillan, John Cairns, Matthew G Wallis, Fiona J Gilbert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 13 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
Computer Science | 7 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 21% |
Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,708
of 7,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,404
of 182,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.