You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Developing criteria and data to determine best options for expanding the core CODIS loci
|
---|---|
Published in |
Investigative Genetics, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2041-2223-3-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jianye Ge, Arthur Eisenberg, Bruce Budowle |
Abstract |
Recently, the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) Core Loci Working Group established by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reviewed and recommended changes to the CODIS core loci. The Working Group identified 20 short tandem repeat (STR) loci (composed of the original CODIS core set loci (minus TPOX), four European recommended loci, PentaE, and DYS391) plus the Amelogenin marker as the new core set. Before selecting and finalizing the core loci, some evaluations are needed to provide guidance for the best options of core selection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Researcher | 13 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,771,296
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Genetics
#34
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,482
of 241,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Genetics
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.