↓ Skip to main content

Phase Ib evaluation of a self-adjuvanted protamine formulated mRNA-based active cancer immunotherapy, BI1361849 (CV9202), combined with local radiation treatment in patients with stage IV non-small…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phase Ib evaluation of a self-adjuvanted protamine formulated mRNA-based active cancer immunotherapy, BI1361849 (CV9202), combined with local radiation treatment in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40425-019-0520-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandros Papachristofilou, Madeleine M. Hipp, Ute Klinkhardt, Martin Früh, Martin Sebastian, Christian Weiss, Miklos Pless, Richard Cathomas, Wolfgang Hilbe, Georg Pall, Thomas Wehler, Jürgen Alt, Helge Bischoff, Michael Geißler, Frank Griesinger, Karl-Josef Kallen, Mariola Fotin-Mleczek, Andreas Schröder, Birgit Scheel, Anke Muth, Tobias Seibel, Claudia Stosnach, Fatma Doener, Henoch S. Hong, Sven D. Koch, Ulrike Gnad-Vogt, Alfred Zippelius

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 158 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 10 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 67 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 65 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#370,031
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#78
of 3,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,584
of 449,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#3
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.