You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions to tackle cardiovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marc Suhrcke, Till A Boluarte, Louis Niessen |
Abstract |
Low-and middle-income countries are facing both a mounting burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) as well as severe resource constraints that keep them from emulating some of the extensive strategies pursued in high-income countries. There is thus an urgency to identify and implement those interventions that help reap the biggest reductions of the CVD burden, given low resource levels. What are the interventions to combat CVDs that represent good "value for money" in low-and middle-income countries? This study reviews the evidence-base on economic evaluations of interventions located in those countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 149 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
Researcher | 16 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 17% |
Unknown | 44 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 6% |
Psychology | 7 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 15% |
Unknown | 47 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2012.
All research outputs
#13,863,046
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,977
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,698
of 244,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#114
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.