↓ Skip to main content

A simple, step-by-step dissection protocol for the rapid isolation of mouse dorsal root ganglia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
473 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A simple, step-by-step dissection protocol for the rapid isolation of mouse dorsal root ganglia
Published in
BMC Research Notes, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13104-016-1915-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

James N. Sleigh, Greg A. Weir, Giampietro Schiavo

Abstract

The cell bodies of sensory neurons, which transmit information from the external environment to the spinal cord, can be found at all levels of the spinal column in paired structures called dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Rodent DRG neurons have long been studied in the laboratory to improve understanding of sensory nerve development and function, and have been instrumental in determining mechanisms underlying pain and neurodegeneration in disorders of the peripheral nervous system. Here, we describe a simple, step-by-step protocol for the swift isolation of mouse DRG, which can be enzymatically dissociated to produce fully differentiated primary neuronal cultures, or processed for downstream analyses, such as immunohistochemistry or RNA profiling. After dissecting out the spinal column, from the base of the skull to the level of the femurs, it can be cut down the mid-line and the spinal cord and meninges removed, before extracting the DRG and detaching unwanted axons. This protocol allows the easy and rapid isolation of DRG with minimal practice and dissection experience. The process is both faster and less technically challenging than extracting the ganglia from the in situ column after performing a dorsal laminectomy. This approach reduces the time required to collect DRG, thereby improving efficiency, permitting less opportunity for tissue deterioration, and, ultimately, increasing the chances of generating healthy primary DRG cultures or high quality, reproducible experiments using DRG tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 469 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 20%
Researcher 80 17%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Student > Master 48 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 114 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 108 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 4%
Other 51 11%
Unknown 135 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,748,377
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,725
of 4,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,493
of 402,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#52
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.