You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving person-centred care in nursing homes through dementia-care mapping: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-12-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Geertje van de Ven, Irena Draskovic, Eddy MM Adang, Rogier ART Donders, Aukje Post, Sytse U Zuidema, Raymond TCM Koopmans, Myrra JFJ Vernooij-Dassen |
Abstract |
The effectiveness and efficiency of nursing-home dementia care are suboptimal: there are high rates of neuropsychiatric symptoms among the residents and work-related stress among the staff. Dementia-care mapping is a person-centred care method that may alleviate both the resident and the staff problems. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dementia-care mapping in nursing-home dementia care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 67% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 224 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 41 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
Researcher | 23 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
Other | 55 | 24% |
Unknown | 37 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 20% |
Psychology | 28 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
Other | 31 | 13% |
Unknown | 46 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,662,037
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,027
of 3,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,051
of 244,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.