↓ Skip to main content

Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 1,255)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13019-015-0331-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivana Petrovic, Dusko Nezic, Miodrag Peric, Predrag Milojevic, Olivera Djokic, Dragana Kosevic, Nebojsa Tasic, Bosko Djukanovic, Petar Otasevic

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 25%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,234,726
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#35
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,489
of 279,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them