You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wild edible plants used by communities in and around selected forest reserves of Teso-Karamoja region, Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-018-0278-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel Ojelel, Patrick Mucunguzi, Esther Katuura, Esezah K. Kakudidi, Mary Namaganda, James Kalema |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 58 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#18,407,102
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#611
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#323,280
of 436,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.