↓ Skip to main content

Protocol: an improved method to quantify activation of systemic acquired resistance (SAR)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol: an improved method to quantify activation of systemic acquired resistance (SAR)
Published in
Plant Methods, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13007-019-0400-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

José S. Rufián, Javier Rueda-Blanco, Carmen R. Beuzón, Javier Ruiz-Albert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,720,578
of 25,030,708 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#388
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,100
of 459,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,030,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.