↓ Skip to main content

COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 4,971)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
1448 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
reddit
7 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
Published in
Trials, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3173-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Goldacre, Henry Drysdale, Aaron Dale, Ioan Milosevic, Eirion Slade, Philip Hartley, Cicely Marston, Anna Powell-Smith, Carl Heneghan, Kamal R. Mahtani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,448 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 24 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 905. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#11,461
of 19,206,351 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273
of 361,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,206,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them