You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The BrainMap strategy for standardization, sharing, and meta-analysis of neuroimaging data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-4-349 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela R Laird, Simon B Eickhoff, P Mickle Fox, Angela M Uecker, Kimberly L Ray, Juan J Saenz, D Reese McKay, Danilo Bzdok, Robert W Laird, Jennifer L Robinson, Jessica A Turner, Peter E Turkeltaub, Jack L Lancaster, Peter T Fox |
| Abstract |
Neuroimaging researchers have developed rigorous community data and metadata standards that encourage meta-analysis as a method for establishing robust and meaningful convergence of knowledge of human brain structure and function. Capitalizing on these standards, the BrainMap project offers databases, software applications, and other associated tools for supporting and promoting quantitative coordinate-based meta-analysis of the structural and functional neuroimaging literature. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 25% |
| Researcher | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 30 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,655,424
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#350
of 4,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,969
of 126,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#5
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.