↓ Skip to main content

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12955-019-1104-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada, A. Bilbao, L. Ansola, R. Quirós, L. García-Perez, G. Navarro, A. Escobar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 40 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 42 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,274,179
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#405
of 2,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,656
of 460,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#25
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.