↓ Skip to main content

Are we mis-estimating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy? Analysis of assessment methodologies from a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving neurotoxic…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are we mis-estimating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy? Analysis of assessment methodologies from a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy
Published in
BMC Cancer, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12885-019-5302-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Molassiotis, Hui Lin Cheng, Violeta Lopez, Joseph S. K. Au, Alexandre Chan, Aishwarya Bandla, K. T. Leung, Y. C. Li, K. H. Wong, Lorna K. P. Suen, Choi Wan Chan, Janelle Yorke, Carole Farrell, Raghav Sundar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 60 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 66 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,110,021
of 24,870,516 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#345
of 8,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,811
of 450,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#10
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,870,516 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.