You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stigma in health facilities: why it matters and how we can change it
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1256-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Nyblade, Melissa A. Stockton, Kayla Giger, Virginia Bond, Maria L. Ekstrand, Roger Mc Lean, Ellen M. H. Mitchell, La Ron E. Nelson, Jaime C. Sapag, Taweesap Siraprapasiri, Janet Turan, Edwin Wouters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 30% |
| Australia | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 144 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 129 | 11% |
| Researcher | 103 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 59 | 5% |
| Other | 185 | 16% |
| Unknown | 468 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 176 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 175 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 86 | 7% |
| Psychology | 60 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 24 | 2% |
| Other | 140 | 12% |
| Unknown | 498 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#355,174
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#287
of 4,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,706
of 477,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#9
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.