↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of classroom based crew resource management training in the intensive care unit: study design of a controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of classroom based crew resource management training in the intensive care unit: study design of a controlled trial
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter F Kemper, Martine de Bruijne, Cathy van Dyck, Cordula Wagner

Abstract

Crew resource management (CRM) has the potential to enhance patient safety in intensive care units (ICU) by improving the use of non-technical skills. However, CRM evaluation studies in health care are inconclusive with regard to the effect of this training on behaviour and organizational outcomes, due to weak study designs and the scarce use of direct observations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CRM training on attitude, behaviour and organization after one year, using a multi-method approach and matched control units. The purpose of the present article is to describe the study protocol and the underlying choices of this evaluation study of CRM in the ICU in detail.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 113 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 30%
Psychology 17 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 9%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 23 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#3,545,787
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,768
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,054
of 223,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#65
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.