You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of multi-level stigma interventions: state of the science and future directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-018-1244-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deepa Rao, Ahmed Elshafei, Minh Nguyen, Mark L. Hatzenbuehler, Sarah Frey, Vivian F. Go |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 385 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 16% |
| Unknown | 136 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 53 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 12% |
| Psychology | 46 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 157 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,373,124
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#966
of 3,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,162
of 491,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#21
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.