You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Health and economic effects of light rail lines: design, methods, and protocol for a natural experiment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6518-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lawrence D. Frank, Jennifer L. Kuntz, James E. Chapman, Eric H. Fox, John F. Dickerson, Richard T. Meenan, Brian E. Saelens, Deborah R. Young, Janne Boone-Heinonen, Stephen P. Fortmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 66 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 79 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,007,757
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,639
of 15,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,937
of 478,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#276
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.