↓ Skip to main content

Exosomes from endothelial progenitor cells improve outcomes of the lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exosomes from endothelial progenitor cells improve outcomes of the lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury
Published in
Critical Care, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2339-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Zhou, Pengfei Li, Andrew J. Goodwin, James A. Cook, Perry V. Halushka, Eugene Chang, Basilia Zingarelli, Hongkuan Fan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 42 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,988
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,153
of 457,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#99
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.