You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient-specific 3D printed and augmented reality kidney and prostate cancer models: impact on patient education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
3D Printing in Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41205-019-0041-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole Wake, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Richard Huang, Katalina U. Park, James S. Wysock, Samir S. Taneja, William C. Huang, Daniel K. Sodickson, Hersh Chandarana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 181 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 71 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 25% |
| Engineering | 18 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 78 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,637,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from 3D Printing in Medicine
#10
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,695
of 370,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 3D Printing in Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them