You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MRXCAT: Realistic numerical phantoms for cardiovascular magnetic resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-014-0063-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lukas Wissmann, Claudio Santelli, William P Segars, Sebastian Kozerke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 38% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 55 | 38% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 16 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,757,580
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#720
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,936
of 248,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.