↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of nursing home residents in Europe: the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of nursing home residents in Europe: the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graziano Onder, Iain Carpenter, Harriet Finne-Soveri, Jacob Gindin, Dinnus Frijters, Jean Claude Henrard, Thorsten Nikolaus, Eva Topinkova, Matteo Tosato, Rosa Liperoti, Francesco Landi, Roberto Bernabei

Abstract

Aims of the present study are the following: 1. to describe the rationale and methodology of the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study, a project funded by the European Union, aimed at implementing the interRAI instrument for Long Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF) as a tool to assess and gather uniform information about nursing home (NH) residents across different health systems in European countries; 2. to present the results about the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the interRAI LTCF instrument translated into the languages of participating countries; 3 to illustrate the characteristics of NH residents at study entry.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 219 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 17%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 16 7%
Other 51 23%
Unknown 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 15%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Psychology 13 6%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 60 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,983,739
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,469
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,482
of 223,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#97
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.