↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy and tolerability of artemisinin-piperaquine (Artequick®) versus artesunate-amodiaquine (Coarsucam™) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in south-central…

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The efficacy and tolerability of artemisinin-piperaquine (Artequick®) versus artesunate-amodiaquine (Coarsucam™) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in south-central Vietnam
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nguyen Xuan Thanh, Trieu Nguyen Trung, Nguyen Chinh Phong, Huynh Hong Quang, Bui Dai, G Dennis Shanks, Marina Chavchich, Michael D Edstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 79 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,562,306
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,522
of 5,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,750
of 165,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#52
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.