You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-019-0144-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristina Staley, Emma Cockcroft, Andrea Shelly, Kristin Liabo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 40 | 47% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 62% |
| Scientists | 22 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 33% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 20% |
| Psychology | 5 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#782,185
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#39
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,177
of 368,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.