You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-0975-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annette M. O’Connor, Guy Tsafnat, Stephen B. Gilbert, Kristina A. Thayer, Ian Shemilt, James Thomas, Paul Glasziou, Mary S. Wolfe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 72% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Librarian | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 14 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,451,353
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#210
of 2,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,398
of 367,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#8
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.