↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of the impacts of metal mining and the effectiveness of mining mitigation measures on social–ecological systems in Arctic and boreal regions: a systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of the impacts of metal mining and the effectiveness of mining mitigation measures on social–ecological systems in Arctic and boreal regions: a systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0152-8
Authors

Neal R. Haddaway, Steven J. Cooke, Pamela Lesser, Biljana Macura, Annika E. Nilsson, Jessica J. Taylor, Kaisa Raito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 433 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 74 17%
Student > Master 52 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 7%
Researcher 23 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 181 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 54 12%
Engineering 43 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 4%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Other 89 21%
Unknown 195 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#743,508
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#16
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,454
of 366,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.