↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the effect of an antenatal pelvic floor muscle exercise programme on female sexual function during pregnancy and the first 3 months following birth: study protocol for a pragmatic…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the effect of an antenatal pelvic floor muscle exercise programme on female sexual function during pregnancy and the first 3 months following birth: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3226-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sahar Sadat Sobhgol, Holly Priddis, Caroline A. Smith, Hannah Grace Dahlen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Master 19 13%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 61 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 40 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Psychology 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 64 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,644,066
of 16,626,023 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,062
of 4,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,913
of 271,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,626,023 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them