You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Building a learning community of Australian clinical genomics: a social network study of the Australian Genomic Health Alliance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1274-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet C. Long, Chiara Pomare, Stephanie Best, Tiffany Boughtwood, Kathryn North, Louise A. Ellis, Kate Churruca, Jeffrey Braithwaite |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 13 | 68% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Scientists | 8 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,468,289
of 24,512,028 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,617
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,140
of 358,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#35
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,512,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.