You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6540-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J. Gidlow, Naomi J. Ellis, Victoria Riley, Tim Chadborn, Amanda Bunten, Zafar Iqbal, Aliko Ahmed, Alistair Fisher, David Sugden, David Clark-Carter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Israel | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 39% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 39% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 16% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,078,847
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,598
of 16,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,181
of 358,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#91
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.