↓ Skip to main content

The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0682-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen Yan, Qian Chen, Xuemei Zhang, Marko Elovainio, Yan Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 11 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,651,088
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#561
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,641
of 352,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#32
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.