↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13018-018-0929-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhao Wang, Jing-zhao Hou, Can-hua Wu, Yue-jiang Zhou, Xiao-ming Gu, Hai-hong Wang, Wu Feng, Yan-xiao Cheng, Xia Sheng, Hong-wei Bao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 14 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 58 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 62 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,725,277
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#190
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,503
of 337,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.