↓ Skip to main content

FoPA: identifying perturbed signaling pathways in clinical conditions using formal methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FoPA: identifying perturbed signaling pathways in clinical conditions using formal methods
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12859-019-2635-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatemeh Mansoori, Maseud Rahgozar, Kaveh Kavousi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Other 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Psychology 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,669,294
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,371
of 7,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,715
of 353,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#135
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.