↓ Skip to main content

Multiscale Poincaré plots for visualizing the structure of heartbeat time series

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiscale Poincaré plots for visualizing the structure of heartbeat time series
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12911-016-0252-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teresa S. Henriques, Sara Mariani, Anton Burykin, Filipa Rodrigues, Tiago F. Silva, Ary L. Goldberger

Abstract

Poincaré delay maps are widely used in the analysis of cardiac interbeat interval (RR) dynamics. To facilitate visualization of the structure of these time series, we introduce multiscale Poincaré (MSP) plots. Starting with the original RR time series, the method employs a coarse-graining procedure to create a family of time series, each of which represents the system's dynamics in a different time scale. Next, the Poincaré plots are constructed for the original and the coarse-grained time series. Finally, as an optional adjunct, color can be added to each point to represent its normalized frequency. We illustrate the MSP method on simulated Gaussian white and 1/f noise time series. The MSP plots of 1/f noise time series reveal relative conservation of the phase space area over multiple time scales, while those of white noise show a marked reduction in area. We also show how MSP plots can be used to illustrate the loss of complexity when heartbeat time series from healthy subjects are compared with those from patients with chronic (congestive) heart failure syndrome or with atrial fibrillation. This generalized multiscale approach to Poincaré plots may be useful in visualizing other types of time series.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 7 10%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,308,732
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,806
of 1,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,940
of 400,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#30
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,991 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.