↓ Skip to main content

Three-dimensional modeling of chromatin structure from interaction frequency data using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three-dimensional modeling of chromatin structure from interaction frequency data using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-12-414
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathieu Rousseau, James Fraser, Maria A Ferraiuolo, Josée Dostie, Mathieu Blanchette

Abstract

Long-range interactions between regulatory DNA elements such as enhancers, insulators and promoters play an important role in regulating transcription. As chromatin contacts have been found throughout the human genome and in different cell types, spatial transcriptional control is now viewed as a general mechanism of gene expression regulation. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C) and its variant Hi-C are techniques used to measure the interaction frequency (IF) between specific regions of the genome. Our goal is to use the IF data generated by these experiments to computationally model and analyze three-dimensional chromatin organization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 163 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 28%
Researcher 46 25%
Student > Master 19 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 19%
Computer Science 16 9%
Mathematics 8 4%
Physics and Astronomy 7 4%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 17 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2012.
All research outputs
#12,852,556
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,776
of 7,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,572
of 140,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#56
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.