↓ Skip to main content

Can we apply the Mendelian randomization methodology without considering epigenetic effects?

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can we apply the Mendelian randomization methodology without considering epigenetic effects?
Published in
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1742-7622-6-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ikechukwu U Ogbuanu, Hongmei Zhang, Wilfried Karmaus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
United States 2 3%
Unknown 70 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Lecturer 6 8%
Professor 5 7%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Mathematics 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#114
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,438
of 104,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them