You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome and pan-genome analysis to classify emerging bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Direct, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13062-019-0234-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aurélia Caputo, Pierre-Edouard Fournier, Didier Raoult |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 33% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 193 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 70 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,504,787
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#107
of 494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,228
of 354,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.