↓ Skip to main content

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Published in
Trials, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1209-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas G. Altman, Curt D. Furberg, Jeremy M. Grimshaw

Abstract

A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors-in-Chief and staff of Trials warmly thank the 854 reviewers whose comments helped to shape the journal, for their invaluable assistance with review of manuscripts in Volume 16 (2015).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,537,072
of 7,684,314 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,584
of 2,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,033
of 287,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#100
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,684,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.