↓ Skip to main content

Allergen immunotherapy for insect venom allergy: protocol for a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allergen immunotherapy for insect venom allergy: protocol for a systematic review
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13601-016-0095-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sangeeta Dhami, Ulugbek Nurmatov, Eva-Maria Varga, Gunter Sturm, Antonella Muraro, Cezmi A. Akdis, Darío Antolín-Amérigo, M. Beatrice Bilò, Danijela Bokanovic, Moises A. Calderon, Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz, Joanna N. G. Oude Elberink, Radoslaw Gawlik, Thilo Jakob, Mitja Kosnik, Joanna Lange, Ervin Mingomataj, Dimitris I. Mitsias, Holger Mosbech, Oliver Pfaar, Constantinos Pitsios, Valerio Pravettoni, Graham Roberts, Franziska Ruëff, Betül Ayşe Sin, Aziz Sheikh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 17%
Researcher 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,725,788
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#363
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,733
of 315,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.