↓ Skip to main content

Early nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after lung resection: a randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after lung resection: a randomized trial
Published in
Critical Care, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2361-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariano Alberto Pennisi, Giuseppe Bello, Maria Teresa Congedo, Luca Montini, Dania Nachira, Gian Maria Ferretti, Elisa Meacci, Elisabetta Gualtieri, Gennaro De Pascale, Domenico Luca Grieco, Stefano Margaritora, Massimo Antonelli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 27 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Unspecified 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 29 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,749,636
of 22,058,749 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,579
of 5,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,739
of 287,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,058,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them