You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after lung resection: a randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2361-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariano Alberto Pennisi, Giuseppe Bello, Maria Teresa Congedo, Luca Montini, Dania Nachira, Gian Maria Ferretti, Elisa Meacci, Elisabetta Gualtieri, Gennaro De Pascale, Domenico Luca Grieco, Stefano Margaritora, Massimo Antonelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Colombia | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,109,623
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,872
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,660
of 367,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#54
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.